|
|
|
|
|
Search in Forum:
|
Options:
Search only: |
|
Search terms found in: |
|
Time filter: |
|
Return: |
| Top
results that match
|
|
|
|
Rating:  Votes: 0 rating(s) Score: 0/0 |
Hi,
We are running 2 CAG's in a failover configuration. I updated one of them from "4.5 build 28" to "4.5.7 build 21". Since the update the updated CAG doesn't get licenses anymore from the first CAG, which is setup to be licenseserver. Connectivity between the boxes is ok. Anyone knows whats happening here.
Maybe its solved by updating the licenseserver but i would like to be a little more sure, the license server is also the apliance that usualy used by our clients.. If not solved by updating, is there a dependable way to revert back to the current situation? Thanks in advance for your input. Marco
|
|
|
Rating:  Votes: 0 rating(s) Score: 0/0 |
Hi, the licenseserver must be the same or higher version than the other.
regards, Michael
Hardware is evil and Software is mean!
|
|
|
Rating:  Votes: 0 rating(s) Score: 0/0 |
Thanks for your input Michael. Seems clear to me. What about my question about reverting to the current situation? Im not to keen about updating to an unsecure situation. If it all works everybody is happy if not well you know..
Thanks Marco
|
|
|
Rating:  Votes: 0 rating(s) Score: 0/0 |
Hi Marco,
for this you have to re-image the AG with the older version. But, if the 4.5.7 box runs well, why not update the other? In the actual state it will not work either.
My advice for this situation: 1. Save the configuration on both boxes. 2. Update the second AG
If it works, all is ok, otherwise: Use a 4.5 CD to re-image the boxes and import the saved configurations.
But you don't want to go back, when both systems running at 4.5.7 ;-)
regards, Michael
Hardware is evil and Software is mean!
|
|
|
Rating:  Votes: 0 rating(s) Score: 0/0 |
Hi Michael,
True, I need the update. But the second cag currently has no licenses. So if the second cag gets the same problem (which i dont expect) I need a quick way back to a working situation. Thx for your replies Marco
|
|
|